![]() 2.3.2.11 Firewall & Software Defined Networking.2.3.2.6 Improved management for Proxmox VE clusters.2.3.2.4 General improvements for virtual guests.2.3.2.1 Enhancements in the web interface (GUI).2.2.3.5 Authentication & Permission System.2.2.2.14 Notable bugfixes and general improvements.2.2.2.12 Improved management of Proxmox VE nodes.2.2.2.11 Firewall & Software Defined Networking.2.2.2.6 Improved management for Proxmox VE clusters.2.2.2.4 General improvements for virtual guests.2.2.2.1 Enhancements in the web interface (GUI).2.1.2.12 Improved management of Proxmox VE nodes. ![]() 2.1.2.11 Firewall & Software-Defined Networking.2.1.2.6 Improved management for Proxmox VE clusters.2.1.2.4 General improvements for virtual guests.2.1.2.1 Enhancements in the web interface (GUI).In other words if an instance has been discovered at that point which doesn't have the nofollow keyword in its rel, then the link will be followed. Now observes rel=nofollow in a link, if at the point the engine comes to follow that link, *all instances discovered so far* are marked 'rel=nofollow'.This does raise some questions and the matter is left open at this point. ie if it is internal according to its domain, integrity does not mark it as an external link or treat it as external, ie not following it. Despite collecting the data and possibly generating a warning, Integrity does not *observe* the rel=external at this point.This may be deliberate and is legal but there are serious SEO implications if it happens unintentionally. Now generates a warning if a link that appears to be internal (from its domain) but is marked rel=external.Fixes a problem with the link inspector not displaying all instances of the link url if it appears multiple times on a particular page.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |